“Study” Abroad? Do We Have To?
How much is too much academic work on a study abroad program? What is the true value of travel and culture while abroad? Does it outweigh the value of classroom work?
This is a growing area of contention amongst our students this semester and an ongoing debate amongst the study abroad community. Faculty and staff alike walk a fine line between lessening the work load while abroad and just offering a gut course (or a bird course if you’re from Canada). I have had a multitude of students this semester complain about the workload. In fact one student even stated during an open forum discussion that ‘you shouldn’t have to work as hard as you do at home, during your semester abroad.’
But is that true? And, more importantly, should it be true? Firstly, let us consider the issue of how much work students should be expected to complete during a semester away and the solutions that some of our partners have used for their students. Most programs either send faculty from home campus, hire local adjunct faculty or directly enroll (or through exchange) and have their students take classes at local universities. Typically home campus faculty tend to assign slightly less reading and homework, with fewer examinations or papers and then grade slightly more leniently. Why would they do such a thing? Especially when they have spent their entire working life working in the pursuit of knowledge as well as passing on that knowledge to attentive students.
The answer lies in the non-classroom learning conundrum. One of the more rewarding aspects of studying abroad is that the city, country, continent where one studies can also act as a classroom. Architecture classes can roam the streets of Barcelona taking in some of Gaudi’s masterpieces. Politics students can visit Parliament in London and watch the debates in action. History students can visit the Roman Forum in Rome and arts students the Musee d’Orsay in France (which I would argue is much more fun than the Louvre! :)). Most visiting faculty understand the academic value of slightly lessening the standard quantity of coursework to give way for students to learn in a different way.
This is typically understood and abided by across the board. However, there are two growing trends that buck this mentality and are substantially different in their own thinking. The first is that despite students studying abroad and being able to take in learning through experiences where they are studying, the quantity of work should remain on par with what is demanded at home campus. This tends to create a very difficult situation as most students expect slightly less work while away. But more so, the students are distracted by much more while abroad. For example, the discount airfares in London alone make it affordable (and almost mandatory) for many students to travel on the occasional weekend trip. Who could pass up a 1pence airplane ticket to Florence?! Not to mention the experiences opened up to them in the city; with free entrance to some of the most venerable and awe-inspiring museums and galleries in the world. And does this not have its own value?
This brings us to the second line of thinking, whereby faculty lessen the workload to the point of almost non-existence. Many US students also feel that for example the UK system, which is built upon a more substantial independent study component, means dramatically less work (though by the end of the semester most of my students wish they had studied more to prepare for essays and exams at the end of term). One hopes that this ‘less is more’ mentality is to foster not only academic independence but a personal growth amongst students studying abroad. One could argue that part of the value of study abroad cannot be measured by grades but rather by seeing the personal growth of the students throughout the program.
When American students arrive abroad their naivety is often astounding. But to meet them again at the end of the semester, and see how worldly they’ve become after their trips to Prague, Dublin and Lisbon, is an absolute treat. Their sense of maturity, independence and self assurance is encouraging. This personal growth is truly one of the most valued assets to studying abroad and something that should not be stifled.
Programs should work to promote both personal and academic achievement while abroad. There is no reason to choose one or the other. A course can be academically challenging without pressuring students to their breaking point. And likewise, courses should not be so simplified and easily graded that students feel that they return home with nothing more than an album full of trip photos.
The important and definitely difficult task for study abroad faculty and administrators is to walk a fine line between the two. Promote self growth AND academic achievement. How does your program achieve this? Do your students get all ‘A’s’ or ‘C’s’? Do they need more ‘culture time’?









